Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Patriot Act Is War Act

To Whom It May Concern: events@c-span.org

Subject #1: “The Patriot Actshould be named for what it is, "The War Act

I’m sorry to say AGAIN but differently that I have NOT seen any story in the LA Times about C-Span showing Sensenbrenner Chairing the Patriot Act hearing on June 10, 2003. Sensenbrenner left the meeting room, like a bully taking his ball and going home because he was losing the game. After Sensenbrenner’s unprofessional exit, a participant at the meeting, who was a Middle Easter expert, implied that America needs to admit its mistakes because this, C-Span televised Patriot Act fiasco of a hearing, looks like a conspiracy. A conspiracy that adds, more fuel for the enemy to use in their recruitment programs.

As was mention by one of the Middle Eastern speakers, this hearing was another embarrassment of Americans false Democracy on display. As one government official proclaimed, the medias apparent unwillingness to further report the embarrassment of Americans false Democracy and show the warts of the system, just adds more fuel for distrust of the government and media.

The media let Americans get caught in the government’s war on words game. It’s as if the media and Americans are wrong by not supporting the, fluffily named, Patriot Act. “The Patriot Act” should be named for what it is, The War Act”, then non-support of the War Act would not be seen as being antipatriotic but antiwar.

Subject #2: I think C-SPAN should report that the Patriot Act Hearing Cover Up is easy on Fridays.

After viewing the Internet I see other newspapers also think that Sensenbrenner’s bulling of the Patriot Act / War Act hearing isn’t news worthy. Michael Jackson arriving in court to hear jury’s verdict is more important to the Media then anything else and that’s F-ing sad for real Patriots.

I guess the old story is still true, if you don’t want the media to notice mistakes just have your meeting on Friday. The trouble is the enemy knows our mistakes and our soldiers are dieing because the media is going for the easy entertainment money not world changing news.
Example: Antiwar Is Not Antipatriotic.

The medias uneasy question, “Is anybody in a Think Tank smart enough to arrange Sensenbrenner on Friday and Jackson’s ruling on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday?”

With that being said about Friday meetings, the media will make an announcement on Friday July 1, 2005 saying that making money is more important then providing serious news. Then again, nobody but the media is claiming that the media puts honor before money.

This would all be funny if there weren’t so many deaths evolved.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home